OfficialDakari
/
matrix-dart-sdk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: missing null check 

It seems `device_keys` in the reply of `/keys/query` is not required. While synapse always
sent it, conduit did not, which resulted in an error.
This commit is contained in:
Sorunome 2021-08-27 16:59:01 +02:00
parent 7155500594
commit 56817df437
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B19471D07FC9BE9C
1 changed files with 67 additions and 64 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

131
lib/src/client.dart
View File

@ -1663,74 +1663,77 @@ sort order of ${prevState.sortOrder}. This should never happen...''');
final response = await queryKeys(outdatedLists, timeout: 10000);
if (!isLogged()) return;
for (final rawDeviceKeyListEntry in response.deviceKeys.entries) {
final userId = rawDeviceKeyListEntry.key;
if (!userDeviceKeys.containsKey(userId)) {
_userDeviceKeys[userId] = DeviceKeysList(userId, this);
}
final oldKeys =
Map<String, DeviceKeys>.from(_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys);
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys = {};
for (final rawDeviceKeyEntry in rawDeviceKeyListEntry.value.entries) {
final deviceId = rawDeviceKeyEntry.key;
if (response.deviceKeys != null) {
for (final rawDeviceKeyListEntry in response.deviceKeys.entries) {
final userId = rawDeviceKeyListEntry.key;
if (!userDeviceKeys.containsKey(userId)) {
_userDeviceKeys[userId] = DeviceKeysList(userId, this);
}
final oldKeys = Map<String, DeviceKeys>.from(
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys);
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys = {};
for (final rawDeviceKeyEntry
in rawDeviceKeyListEntry.value.entries) {
final deviceId = rawDeviceKeyEntry.key;
// Set the new device key for this device
final entry = DeviceKeys.fromMatrixDeviceKeys(
rawDeviceKeyEntry.value, this, oldKeys[deviceId]?.lastActive);
if (entry.isValid) {
// is this a new key or the same one as an old one?
// better store an update - the signatures might have changed!
if (!oldKeys.containsKey(deviceId) ||
oldKeys[deviceId].ed25519Key == entry.ed25519Key) {
if (oldKeys.containsKey(deviceId)) {
// be sure to save the verified status
entry.setDirectVerified(oldKeys[deviceId].directVerified);
entry.blocked = oldKeys[deviceId].blocked;
entry.validSignatures = oldKeys[deviceId].validSignatures;
// Set the new device key for this device
final entry = DeviceKeys.fromMatrixDeviceKeys(
rawDeviceKeyEntry.value, this, oldKeys[deviceId]?.lastActive);
if (entry.isValid) {
// is this a new key or the same one as an old one?
// better store an update - the signatures might have changed!
if (!oldKeys.containsKey(deviceId) ||
oldKeys[deviceId].ed25519Key == entry.ed25519Key) {
if (oldKeys.containsKey(deviceId)) {
// be sure to save the verified status
entry.setDirectVerified(oldKeys[deviceId].directVerified);
entry.blocked = oldKeys[deviceId].blocked;
entry.validSignatures = oldKeys[deviceId].validSignatures;
}
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys[deviceId] = entry;
if (deviceId == deviceID &&
entry.ed25519Key == fingerprintKey) {
// Always trust the own device
entry.setDirectVerified(true);
}
if (database != null) {
dbActions.add(() => database.storeUserDeviceKey(
id,
userId,
deviceId,
json.encode(entry.toJson()),
entry.directVerified,
entry.blocked,
entry.lastActive.millisecondsSinceEpoch,
));
}
} else if (oldKeys.containsKey(deviceId)) {
// This shouldn't ever happen. The same device ID has gotten
// a new public key. So we ignore the update. TODO: ask krille
// if we should instead use the new key with unknown verified / blocked status
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys[deviceId] =
oldKeys[deviceId];
}
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys[deviceId] = entry;
if (deviceId == deviceID &&
entry.ed25519Key == fingerprintKey) {
// Always trust the own device
entry.setDirectVerified(true);
}
if (database != null) {
dbActions.add(() => database.storeUserDeviceKey(
id,
userId,
deviceId,
json.encode(entry.toJson()),
entry.directVerified,
entry.blocked,
entry.lastActive.millisecondsSinceEpoch,
));
}
} else if (oldKeys.containsKey(deviceId)) {
// This shouldn't ever happen. The same device ID has gotten
// a new public key. So we ignore the update. TODO: ask krille
// if we should instead use the new key with unknown verified / blocked status
_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys[deviceId] =
oldKeys[deviceId];
}
} else {
Logs().w('Invalid device ${entry.userId}:${entry.deviceId}');
}
}
// delete old/unused entries
if (database != null) {
for (final oldDeviceKeyEntry in oldKeys.entries) {
final deviceId = oldDeviceKeyEntry.key;
if (!_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys.containsKey(deviceId)) {
// we need to remove an old key
dbActions.add(
() => database.removeUserDeviceKey(id, userId, deviceId));
} else {
Logs().w('Invalid device ${entry.userId}:${entry.deviceId}');
}
}
}
_userDeviceKeys[userId].outdated = false;
if (database != null) {
dbActions
.add(() => database.storeUserDeviceKeysInfo(id, userId, false));
// delete old/unused entries
if (database != null) {
for (final oldDeviceKeyEntry in oldKeys.entries) {
final deviceId = oldDeviceKeyEntry.key;
if (!_userDeviceKeys[userId].deviceKeys.containsKey(deviceId)) {
// we need to remove an old key
dbActions.add(
() => database.removeUserDeviceKey(id, userId, deviceId));
}
}
}
_userDeviceKeys[userId].outdated = false;
if (database != null) {
dbActions.add(
() => database.storeUserDeviceKeysInfo(id, userId, false));
}
}
}
// next we parse and persist the cross signing keys