dynamic.copy returned a type
error so I reverted the previous
change of the copyMap
method to an extension. Also
I found out that we have used
two copyMap methods in the
SDK which did exactly the same.
I deleted the old one and
changed the tests.
BREAKING CHANGE: This replaces the old dehydrated devices
implementation, since there is no way to query what is supported easily
and supporting both would be complicated.
fixes https://github.com/famedly/matrix-dart-sdk/issues/1579
There were several issues here. Key uploads in general failed, because
the await caused a Future<dynamic> to be returned, which failed type
checking.
But also we never unset our future, which was used for the online key
backup uploads, which meant we would very quickly stop uploading any
keys at all.
BREAKING CHANGE: This changes the runInRoot method to not return a
future. As a user, if you need the result of an async computation passed
to runInRoot, please await it directly. Also the KeyVerification start
and a few call methods now return a future.
We have disabled it by default to
prevent using workarounds as
long time solutions and to not
miss bugs. But in a federated
context we can not be sure that
we all Matrix clients are ever
bug free and we have now the
onEncryptionError Stream
anyway.
If requesting history happens to contain a m.key.verification.request we currently create a new key verification object and push it to the client.
This fixes it.
The current implementation of sortOrder can be made way more easier now
by just keeping the sortOrder of the list
and the timelineFragments in the hiveStore. This needed a huge
change but mostly removes a lot of code which can be done
way more easy now. This also needed some rewriting of the setState logic and changes to
the prevEvent calculation. This solution should also be more stable.
More information:
https://www.reddit.com/r/fluffychat/comments/pfnlhq/the_sort_order_of_matrix_timelines/
The unawaited method from the pedantic package was a historic solution
for the case that you dont want to await a future in an async function.
But now we can do this with just a comment which
is the recommended way to do this now.
This makes it possible to have pedantic as a dev_dependency which means just one dependency less.
Krille
Mohammad Reza Moradi
Krille
Nicolas Werner
Malin Errenst
TheOneWithTheBraid
Jayesh Nirve
Sorunome